A propaganda article in the American Hebrew on October 31, 1919 entitled "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!" In the article, it was claimed that during WORLD WAR 1, because of epidemics, starvation and a "holocaust", SIX MILLION Jewish men and women were in danger of succumbing. This is only one of several examples: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/145-references-to-6000000-jews-prior-to.html?zx=dea2f39387769f50
The first documentaries above further elaborate on previous claims of 6 million dead in a holocaust going back to 1900, put out by various Jewish organizations. The second, "Auschwitz: The Surprising Hidden Truth", illustrates the technical impossibility that Auschwitz was put to the use that is commonly claimed.
The third video above, illustrating the absurd fabrications in the testimony of purported "survivors" is "The Last Days of the Big Lie".
Of course, documentaries can often be limited. When searching for relevant primary and authoritative sources, books can often be better. So I have added Germar Rudolf’s mind blowing texts, "Lectures on the Holocaust" and "Dissecting the Holocaust". These can be accessed in the "all files" link.
Interestingly, Rudolf was imprisoned for writing this book. If his arguments were so false, then why would he need to be imprisoned for pushing them?
Another good introduction, for the uninitiated, before proceeding with this essay, is here: http://ihr.org/leaflets/auschwitz.shtml
Many people believe that a fundamental problem of the 20th Century was that of Nazis killing Jews. But the evidence for this is very problematic, as admitted by the leading proponents of this thesis:
Robert Jan van Pelt, a Jewish Auschwitz expert, author of several books on Auschwitz, and expert witness at the 2000 Irving vs. Lipstadt trial, and who said at the trial: "Auschwitz is like the Holy of Holies. I have prepared for years to go there, and have a fool come in, coming completely unprepared, it is sacrilege, somebody who walks into the Holy of Holies and doesn't give a damn": http://hdot.org/en/trial/transcripts/day09/pages46-50
admitted, regarding Auschwitz, "My first problem was rather straightforward: the evidence for Auschwitz was undoubtedly problematic.": http://tinyurl.com/dyly9kw
And in an interview with the Toronto Star, he admitted, "Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove": http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/742965--a-case-for-letting-nature-take-back-auschwitz
In the trial of Ernst Zundel, Doug Christie interrogated Raul Hilberg, considered the world's greatest expert on the holocaust, as follows:
"Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” defence counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination.
“I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied.
“You are (at a loss) because you can’t,” Christie said.”: http://tinyurl.com/82vcgnw
Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus at the University of Ulster, said on December 5, 2005: http://www.rense.com/general69/porof.htm
"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct - not a single mention of Nazi "gas chambers," a "genocide" of the Jews, or of "six million" Jewish victims of the war.
This is astonishing. How can it be explained?
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi "gas chambers," a "genocide" of the Jews, or of "six million" Jewish victims of the war.
University of Ulster
Douglas Reed was the Central European correspondent for the London Times during this time period.
Reed wrote about this issue in a chapter of "The Controversy of Zion" entitled "The Talmudic Vengeance", where he noted:
"Certain symbolic deeds were evidently meant to establish the authorship, or nature, of the vengeance. These crowning acts of symbolism were the reproductions, after nearly thirty years, of the similar acts committed during the revolution in Russia: the Talmudic boast left on the wall of the Romanoffs' death chamber and the canonization of Judas Iscariot. After the Second World War the Nazi leaders were hanged on the Jewish Day of Judgment in 1946, so that their execution was presented to Jewry in the shape of Mordecai's vengeance on Haman and his sons. Then in the Bavarian village of Oberammergau, where the world-famous Passion Play had been performed for three centuries, the players of the chief parts were put on trial for "Nazi activities" before a Communist court. Those who appeared as Jesus and the apostles were all declared guilty; the one performer acquitted was he who took the part of Judas.
These things do not happen by accident, and the vengeance on Germany, like the earlier one on Russia, was in this way given the imprint of a Talmudic vengeance (that is, a vengeance on Christendom, the Talmud being the specifically anti-Christian continuation of the pre-Christian Torah). The vengeful writ ran on both sides of the line which by that time was supposed to be an "Iron Curtain" dividing "the free world" from the enslaved Asiatic one; in this matter of vengeance there was no iron curtain. Nuremberg was in the Western zone; Oberammergau in the Soviet one.
By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of "the Jews". The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. "Crimes against Jews" were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men, from which Jews in their proportion suffered in Germany). This particular indictment was made "the crux of the case" against the defendants (Captain Liddell Hart's words) and was based on the assertion that "six million Jews" had been killed (as time went by the word "perished" was substituted for "killed"). An impartial court would at the outset have thrown out any suit based on this completely unverifiable assertion: At Nuremberg lawyers, who in a private case would have demanded acquittal on the strength of an unproven statement in respect of a decimal point or digit, used this fantastic figure as the basis of their demand for conviction.
I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were "singled out" from the mass of Hitler's victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler's book-bonfire became "the burning of Jewish books"; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of" 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff" was changed to "150,000 Jews"; and so on interminably).
The statement about the "six million Jews", allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.
The figure would not even deserve scrutiny if it had not been used to give the Second War the brand of "a Jewish war" and if that, again, did not foreshadow the shape of any third war. Because of that, it may be examined here.
At no time in history, from antiquity to this day, can the number of Judahites, Judeans or Jews, living at any given time, be determined; for that reason the number afflicted in any calamity also cannot be determined, and there are many more reasons why the number of Jewish victims in the Second World War cannot be fixed. The process of mystification begins in Genesis and continues through the Torah (the seventy people taken by Jacob to Egypt, for instance, apparently increased to two or three million within 150 years). At all periods large, and sometimes huge variations occur in the "estimates", and only estimates are possible, as the present term, "Jew", is legally indefinable and statistically elusive.
An eminent Jewish authority, Dr. Hans Kohn, in his article on "the distribution of Jews" in the Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year for 1942, writes:
"In view of the fact that in several of the countries where the largest number of Jews were living in 1941 the census did not contain any questions regarding religion ... the exact number of Jews in the world in 1941 could not be ascertained. The definition of persons falling under the classification of 'Jewish race' is in no way agreed upon ... In countries where the census included questions of religious origins, even this religious criterion of Jewish faith is difficult to define exactly. Thus the assumption which generally varied around the figure of 16 million" (for the entire world) "cannot claim any foundation on exact 'figures. To this uncertainty about the number of Jews in the world was added in recent years a growing uncertainty about their numerical distribution in the different countries and continents. Probably more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and the U.S.S.R."
A weaker basis than that even for "estimates" (not to speak of "statistics") can hardly be imagined, yet in the ensuing period, when all the additional confusions of war and occupation were piled on this infirm foundation, precise numbers of Jewish casualties were produced day by day, circulated by thousands of assiduous propagandists, and at the end dec1ared to amount to six millions!
Dr. Kohn says that "probably" more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and U.S.S.R. in 1941. In respect of the U.S.S.R. this might corroborate another Jewish authority (Prof. H.M.T. Loewe), who said in the Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 that 2,700,000 Jews then lived there. Similarly, four years earlier (1933) the Jewish journal Opinion had stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was under 3,000,000; and the Soviet official Encyclopaedia in 1953 stated that "the Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939 was 3,020,000".
This near agreement among four authorities in respect of the period 1933-1941 might lead the reader to think that the number of Jews in one country at least (the U.S.S.R.) was established with reasonable accuracy at a given time. On the contrary, this is a statistical jungle where nothing is ever established. In 1943 the Jewish Commissar Mikhoels said in London (according to the Johannesburg Jewish Times of 1952), "Today we have in the Soviet Union 5,000,000 Jews". That is two million more than two years before, and if it was true presumably meant that most of the Jews in Poland, after Hitler and Stalin fell out, moved into Soviet territory. However, in the same issue of the Jewish Times a leading Jewish writer, Mr. Joseph Leftwich, stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. in 1952 was 2,500;000, "a loss since 1943 of 2,500,000". He asked, "where and how did they disappear?"; the answer, in my judgment, is that most of them disappeared into the statistics.
That is not the end of the confusion in this one section of the question. The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 (in giving the above-cited figure of 2,700,000 Jews in Russia on Jewish authority) said they formed about six percent of the total population. The total population was elsewhere given in the same encyc1opaedia as 145,000,000 and six percent of that would be 8,700,000!
The encyc1opaedias, statistical yearbooks and almanacs are in this one question all at odds with each other and untrustworthy. I could multiply examples (for instance, the Jewish World Congress in 1953 announced that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 1,500,000) but wandering in a maze without an outlet is profitless. All published figures are "estimates" made at the estimators' pleasure, and are without value. A professional accountant might write a book on the efforts of the encyc1opaedists to make the post-war figure of Jewish population in the world conform with the pre-war "estimates", minus six million. Figures are tricky things: a few examples:
The leading American reference yearbook, the World Almanac, in 1947 gave the 1939 Jewish world-population as 15,688,259. In later editions up to 1952 it increased this prewar estimate (without explanation) by a million, to 16,643,120. It gave the 1950 population as 11,940,000, which, if subtracted from the first figure given for 1939, gives a reduction of nearly four millions (though not of six). However, it based even this "estimate" on another estimate, name1y, that in 1950 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 2,000,000. This still left unanswered Mr. Leftwich's question in respect of Commissar Mikhoels's statement, that in 1943 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 5,000,000.
In England Whitaker's Almanac, of similar eminence, struggled with the same problem. In its 1949 and 1950 issues it gave the 1939 "estimated" Jewish world population as 16,838,000 and that of 1949 as 11,385,200, a reduction of nearly 5,500,000. However, the figures given for Jewish population in separate countries added up to 13,120,000 (not 11,385,200). Incidentally, Whitaker's in 1950 gave the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. as 5,300,000, against the World Almanac's figure for the same year, of 2,000,000.
Both these publications are of the highest repute for painstaking accuracy and the fault is not theirs; in this one matter alone only Jewish "estimates" are available, and for obvious reasons no dependence can be placed on these. I pointed out the discrepancies in a book of 1951 and observed that Whitaker's in 1952 no longer contained these "estimates of Jewish populations"; apparently it had abandoned the statistical quest as hopeless, and was right to do so. Another encyclopaedia in its 1950 edition also dropped the subject.
Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world's leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war's end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.
Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of "mass-extermination" to posterity. At the war's end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that "the Nazis . . . reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination". He called this "a bare statistical statement" and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: "it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable". Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish "calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error". He concludes that "it might be estimated" that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.
The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been "done to death" or caused to "perish", for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.
The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term "Jew" is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as "discrimination" and "anti-semitism". For instance:
"Immigrants seeking to settle in Australia will from now on not be asked on application forms if they are Jewish, it was made known in Sydney by the executive committee of Australian Jewry, which protested against this practice to the immigration authorities" (the Jewish Times, Johannesburg). In England, "it is impossible, in the absence of official statistics, to do more than make an intelligent guess . . . the exact number of Jews in Britain remains a mystery" (the Zionist Record, Johannesburg). In America, President Roosevelt was brought under unremitting pressure to abolish the requirement to state "Jewish" on immigration forms, and in 1952 a major campaign was waged by the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee against the McCarran-Walter Act because it sought to restore this requirement. This act was in the event passed over President Truman's veto, but even a rigorous application of the reinstated requirement would not lead to clarification, as applicants, if they wish, may insert "British" or any similar description, instead of "Jewish".
This state of statistical affairs is now wellnigh universal, so that the whole question is a mystery and has deliberately been made one. None can even guess the number of Jews whose deaths, during the war, were not natural or the result of bombing and the like, but who were done to death by the Nazis. My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other. I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated.
The reason, hidden from them, became clear with the hangings on the Jewish Day of Judgment, for this symbolic act set the pattern for the entire conduct of the occupation, on both sides of the line, in its early years, and even for the future conduct of Western foreign policy far outside the bounds of Europe. The Talmudic vengeance was the start of a new era in the history of the West, during which all national considerations were to be subordinated to the cause of Jewish nationhood, as represented by the Talmudists from Russia.
I have a description, from a person who was present, of the manner in which the Nuremberg judgment came to be delivered on September 30 and October l, 1946 (between the Jewish New Year, September 26, and the Jewish Day of Atonement, October 5), and was executed immediately after midnight in the morning of October 16, Hoshana Rabba, the day when the Jewish god, after an interval during which he considers his verdict on every single human being, and may still pardon sinners, delivers his final judgment. This description says, "... all thought the judgment would be delivered sooner than it was, and a number of trifling circumstances delayed it, till the date was fixed somewhere round September 15 ... Then X, one of the member judges, objected to the literary form of part of the judgment... it was roughly ca1culated how long it would take to recast it and to recopy the recasting; and the date was fixed by this".
I have deleted the name of the member judge. As a result of this delay for literary improvement the judgment fell midway through the holiest ten days of the Jewish Year and was executed on the day of Jehovah's vengeance. I had foretold some such denouement, in a book published during the war, after Mr. Anthony Eden, on 17 December 1942 in the House of Commons, had made a "Declaration" about the Jews, in which he implicitly limited to the Jews the threat that "Those responsible for these crimes shall not escape retribution". Mr. Roosevelt, in America, had made a declaration of similar implication.
The Nuremberg trial formed the model for many lesser "war crimes" trials; these have been discussed, from the legal and moral point of view, in the books of Mr. Montgomery Belgion, Mr. F.J.P. Veale and the late Captain Russell Grenfell. A little of the truth about them filtered out in the course of years. In 1949 an American Administration of Justice Review Board, appointed after numerous protests, reported on some of the American military court trials at Dachau, where 297 death sentences had been approved. The report spoke of "mock trials" to which the defendants had been brought hooded, with ropes round their necks, and "tried" before mock-altars with crucifixes and candles; they were subjected to brutal treatment in the effort to extort confessions which then could be produced before the real trial (the prisoners were led to believe that the mock-trial was the genuine one)."
Now, let us not delude ourselves. There certainly were ad hoc mass machine gunnings of Jews by the Nazi Einsatzgruppen (many of these being commisars): http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/Bruns/index.html
But the magnitude of even these killings has been grossly exaggerated, and all these exaggerations have obfuscated the severe nature of Soviet and Allied atrocities. And absurd fabrications have been put forth in this area: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/child-victims-of-nazis.html
It was admitted as early as 1949, by a British lawyer, that the Nazis own figures of Jews murdered by the Einsatzgruppen were exaggerated by 1000%.
And the Soviets evacuated most of the Jews before the Nazis even got there!:
It is important to note that Hitler said that he would "tackle the Jewish problem" once the war was over (and as the article by Paul Grubach noted, this meant mass deportation): http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/TableTalk240742.html
The Wannsee conference was where Nazi leadership decided what to do about the "Jewish question". as noted, Hitler believed that winning the war was much more important to him than dealing with those matters. His orders quoted by his chief civil servant Dr Hans Lammers, chief of the Reich Chancellery, to Franz Schlegelberger, of the Ministry of Justice, as follows: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Schlegelberger/DocItself0342.html
"Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers' opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party."
Irving's overview of the conference provides insight: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Wannsee.html
And clearly Hitler intended to release large numbers of Jews after the war, hence his constant reference, in private to Himmler and others, to the Madagascar plan, as late as July 24 1942 (Table Talk): http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/TableTalk240742.html
The revisionist scholar Carlo Mattogno, in "Auschwitz: The Case for Sanity", made mention of a very interesting letter: http://archive.org/details/CarloMattognoAuschwitzTheCaseForSanity2010
On January 21, 1943, the SS-Standortarzt (garrison surgeon) of Auschwitz, SSHauptsturmführer Eduard Wirths, wrote a letter to the camp commander [Rudolf Höss]:[Footnote: 105 RGVA (Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennii Vojennii Archiv (Russian national war archives),
Moscow), 502-1-313, p. 57]
“1. The SS garrison surgeon at Auschwitz requests to install a partition in the dissecting hall planned for the new crematorium building at Birkenau, dividing the hall into 2 rooms of equal size and to have 1 or 2 wash basins installed in the first of these rooms, because the latter will be needed as an autopsy room, whereas the 2nd room will be needed for anatomical preparations, for the preservation of files and writing materials and books, for the preparation of colored tissue sections and for work with the microscope.
2. Furthermore it is requested to provide for an ‘undressing room’ [Auskleideraum] in the cellar rooms."
This request was implemented. And it raises an important question - why would Nazis want to keep office equipment in a "gas chamber"?
Mattogno's commentary on this, and the actual nature of the "undressing rooms" (pp. 72-79), is well worth reading. It concludes:
"We now have the answers to the two questions raised in the beginning:
1) The “Auskleideraum” was used for the corpses of the detainees who had died in the camp. At the Belsen trial, SS-Hauptsturmführer Josef Kramer, commander of the Auschwitz camp from May 8, 1944, declared in this respect (Phillips, p. 731):
"Whoever died during the day was put into a special building called the mortuary, and they were carried to the crematorium every evening by lorry. They were loaded on the lorry and off the lorry by prisoners. They were stripped by the prisoners of their clothes in the crematorium before being cremated."
2) Initially a barrack set up in front of the crematorium was used as "Auskleideraum," because “Leichenkeller 2” was not yet operational on
January 21, 1943, the day SS garrison surgeon requested an “Auskleideraum”;
Leichenkeller 1 was available from February 11.
The existence of an undressing room in the crematorium is therefore entirely normal, as results moreover from the assignment of rooms in
crematorium I of the main camp: Laying-out room (Aufbahrungsraum), corpse washing room (Waschraum) and morgue (Leichenhalle). As the corpses were cremated without a coffin, the Aufbahrungsraum was not a “hall for the placement of the corpse on a stretcher” but a room in
which the bodies were undressed before being washed in the room next door and finally placed naked in the morgue."
Most serious Revisionists conclude that somewhere between 69,000 and 150,000 people died at Auschwitz from all causes, mostly disease and starvation brought on by the obliteration of German supply lines in Allied bombing raids. This number is based on the Auschwitz death books released to the Soviet Archives in 1989, the reports of the International Red Cross who inspected the camps, and other evidence: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p265_Weber.html
(Note: I did not track down the sources for the following, but they are presented as fuel for further investigation:
It has now been acknowledged by one of France's most influential and reputable magazines, L'Express, that the “gas chamber” shown to tourists in Auschwitz I main camp is a fake that was concocted three years after the war by the Communists for propaganda purposes: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html
Auschwitz in fact had a swimming pool (fitted with a diving board), a soccer field, a cinema, a theater, a brothel, hospitals, a post-office, religious facilities, a sauna, an artist’s studio, kitchens, dental facilities, and so on. These are hardly things one would expect to find in a "death camp": http://rense.com/lets_stop_with_the_auschwitz_lies.htm.html
In Auschwitz, there was actually a theater where actor inmates performed skits, plays and organized musical ensembles(!): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeME45M0vW0)
The chemist Germar Rudolf, in an analysis of and report on the alleged gas chamber, noted the following in his conclusion to the report: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/trr/
"-Even according to the statements of pharmacist J.C. Pressac, who, in the late 80s and early 90s, was promoted as THE technical Holocaust expert, eyewitness testimonies relating to the engineering of the installations and their capacity are, almost without exception, untenable. But even the corrections to the testimonies considered by Pressac to be necessary do not go far enough to make them credible. In particular, the testimonies relating to the duration of executions in the 'gas chambers' (morgue 1) of crematoria II and III, as well as the ventilation times after the executions go completely awry. This is because of the over-estimation of the evaporation rate of hydrogen cyanide from the carrier of Zyklon B, as well as the incorrect concept of the effectiveness of the ventilation of the rooms. If the eyewitness testimonies relating to the quantities of Zyklon B used, and at least approximately relating to the rapidity of the execution procedure are to be accepted, then they are incompatible with testimonies, sometimes of the same witnesses, that the victims' corpses were removed from the 'gas chambers' immediately after the executions and without gas masks and protective garments. This is particularly true for those alleged 'gas chambers' without ventilation installations (crematoria IV and V and farmhouses I and II), since working in poorly ventilated 'gas chambers' with high concentrations of poison gas is impossible without gas masks. The extreme danger to the sweating workers of the Sonderkommando, who are supposed to have worked without protective garments, makes the witnesses untrustworthy. The eyewitness accounts are therefore completely contradictory, illogical, contrary to the laws of nature, and therefore incredible. The witnesses engage in particular contortions when it comes to the cremations (amount and kind of fuel used, speed of cremation, development of flames and smoke), which furthermore fail to accord with the analyses of aerial photography.
-The alleged installations for the mass murder of human beings are, in Pressac's judgment, impractical for their purpose, but were, on the contrary, illogically constructed in parts, so that they would not have been suitable as instruments of mass extermination. Once one considers the actual technical requirements, the impression remains of the total inadequacy of the installations in question-which were deficient to the point of uselessness-in gross contradiction to the technically advanced disinfestation chambers in the immediate vicinity. The facts set forth here with relation to Zyklon B introduction pillars in the ceilings of the 'gas chambers' (morgue 1) of crematoria I to III strengthen the suspicion of a subsequent manipulation almost to a certainty. These installations would have been even less suitable than crematoria IV and V. It would have been impossible to introduce the gas into them.
-Due to the proven, enormous environmental resistance of Iron Blue pigment, the slight cyanide traces in alleged homicidal 'gas chambers', which are demonstrable in places, but are not reproducible, cannot be explained on the basis of remaining residues of a disintegration process, since even on the weathered exterior side of the disinfestation wing large quantities of cyanide can be found even today. Towards the end of the operating period of the installations, therefore, the cyanide content must have been present in the same order of magnitude as it is today, as well as in the areas which were never exposed to weathering. But the cyanide values of protected areas in the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers' are just as low as in places exposed to weathering. Weathering has, therefore, not actually diminished these slight traces. The low cyanide values cannot be explained by fumigation of the premises for vermin, as postulated by Leuchter, since such fumigation would probably have left greater quantities of cyanide in the moist cellars of crematoria II and III. The cyanide values of the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers' lie in the same order of magnitude as the results, among others, of the samples taken by myself from parts of other buildings (hot air disinfestation Building 5a, inmates barracks, the washroom of crematorium I). These values, however, lie so near the detectable threshold that no clear significance can be attributed to them, most importantly due to their lack of reproducibility. From the above, one can safely conclude that no cyanide residues capable of interpretation can be found in the walls of the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers'.
It was further possible to show that, under the conditions of the mass gassings as reported by eyewitnesses in the alleged 'gas chambers' of crematorium II to V, cyanide residues would have been found in similar quantities, coloring the walls blue, as they can be found in the disinfestation wings of building 5a/b. Since no significant quantities of cyanide were found in the alleged homicidal 'gas chamber', one must conclude that these installations were exposed to similar conditions as the above mentioned other installations (hot air disinfestation, inmate barracks, washroom of crematorium I), i.e., that they most likely were never exposed to any hydrogen cyanide."
Rudolf has of course been libeled, a rebuttal of that libel is here: http://vho.org/GB/c/GR/Green.html
Many people are still hypnotized the "horrific images" they have seen of this event. Many of these photographs were hoaxes, or were a result of Allied/Soviet actions. See, as an introduction to this fact, the following: http://vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcffor.html
Many of these images and much of this footage was produced by the psychological warfare department of the American military, as well as psych-warfare agents in Britain and the Soviet Union, and you can even see, in the background of some of this footage, Billy Wilder, the man who directed Marylin Monroe in "Some Like it Hot", who had an axe to grind with Hitler, since his rise to power was inconvenient for him and he had to leave the country, and who is seen wearing a director's garb of all black and a beret! This, and many other aspects of this psychological warfare operation, are explored in depth in the documentary "Buchenwald: A Dumb, Dumb Portrayal of Evil": http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/Buchenwald/
as noted, the inmates of the German concentration camps lived quite luxurious lives. They were provided with sports stadiums, concerts, gardens, swimming pools, and all manner of other benefits. In contrast, the Soviet GULAG system was utterly brutal. We can see actual primary source footage as a basis for our comparisons here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAL2Zi8V8Wo
A “final solution” of extermination was not proposed by a German Nazi, but rather by an American Jew; and it was not the extermination of Jews which he proposed, but the genocide of German Gentiles. Theodor Newman Kaufman advocated the genocidal sterilization of all Germans as a “final solution” in 1941 in his book “Germany Must Perish!”, before the Wannsee-Konferenz occurred.
Here is a relevant quote from the book:
“A final solution: Let Germany be policed forever by an international armed force? Even if such a huge undertaking were feasible life itself would not have it so. As war begets war, suppression begets rebellion. Undreamed horrors would unfold. Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered. There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth!” (Kaufman, Theodor Newman. Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, (1941), p. 88): http://archive.org/details/GermanyMustPerish_479
The Jewish Communist Ilya Ehrenburg further expressed this anti-German hatred. In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenburg incited Russian soldiers to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … – Kill the Germans! Kill!” (cited in De, Zayas Alfred M. “Nemesis at Potsdam: the Anglo-Americans and the Expulsion of the Germans : Background, Execution, Consequences”. London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1977. p. 66): http://tinyurl.com/3fowj58
On February 29, 1944, a letter from the British Ministry of Information to the BBC and British Clergy noted that the Communists had committed atrocities all over Europe, but to save face, they would fabricate atrocity propaganda to vilify the Germans (http://tinyurl.com/72qxk8d). Subsequently, they would do just that, regurgitating propaganda against Germany that had appeared in other contexts, as false accusations, for years prior to WWII. The Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann admitted what a farce the whole affair was when he said in his autobiography that the whole Nuremberg trail had been prepared YEARS in advance in order to secure Palestine for the Zionists: http://ia600403.us.archive.org/2/items/ZionismAndTheWorldWars/NahumGoldmann_JewishParadoxQuote.jpg
The testimony of the Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss is usually cited as the keystone of proof for exterminationist claims. But this "confession" was actually a false statement obtained by torture. Some years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers tortured the former commandant to obtain this "confession." Höss himself stated: "Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.": http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html
Hoss' testimony is actually contradictory: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/09/rudolf-hoesss-varying-death-toll.html
He also claimed to have witnessed gassings at the Treblinka camp in 1941, when it wasn't even built until 1942: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/07/nazi-time-traveller-rudolf-hoess.html
And his later memoirs, which are bandied about as a means of "proving" exterminationist claims, are likewise full of holes: http://www.vho.org/GB/c/RW/revddeal.html
Many celebrity "survivors" likewise fabricated accounts. For instance, a "world hero", Viktor Frankl, author of "Man's Search for Meaning", was noted by Timothy Pytell, an adjunct professor of history at the Cooper Union in New York City, who embarked upon a research project for an intellectual biography of Frankl, that he spent at most three days at Auschwitz, while in transit from Theresienstadt in Bohemia to a subcamp of Dachau in October 1944: http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/20/5/OKeefe10.html
On Anne Frank, as the aformentioned IHR Leaflet notes: "Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is remembered for her famous diary. But few people are aware that thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank, "survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated from Auschwitz along with many other Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp in western Germany, where she died of typhus in March 1945. While at Auschwitz, Otto Frank came down with typhus, and was sent to the camp hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January 1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was, cannot be reconciled with the familiar extermination story."
And Elie Wiesel, who claims to have an Auschwitz tattoo that is still embedded in his skin, in reality does not have one: http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/the-evidence/the-tattoo/where-is-elies-tattoo/
Thus it is unsurprising that the Prussian Jewish historian Samuel Gringauz, Chairman of the Council of the Central Committee Of Liberated Jews In The American Zone of German, wrote in an 1950 issue of Jewish Social Studies about survivor testimonies: http://tinyurl.com/bwe9tw2
"... most of the memoirs and reports are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks and apologies."
Gerald Reitlinger, in "The Final Solution: The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945", noted: http://tinyurl.com/c79rk8e
"A certain degree of reserve is necessary in handling all this material, and particularly this applies to the last section (survivor narratives)... The Eastern European Jew is a natural rhetorician, speaking in flowery similes..."
(On that, I would like to remind the reader of the oath negating Kol nidre "prayer", mentioned here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/80454336/Kol-Nidre
The anti-Zionist Jew Josef Ginsburg, whose father was a Rabbi, testified as a defense witness in the second trial of Ernst Zündel in 1988. In the testimony, he noted that the statements made by purported "holocaust survivors" would go down by 95.5% if they were made to swear a special oath negating the Kol Nidre prayer (see p. 552 of the following):http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/KULA.pdf)
And the two same Russians who compiled the completely fraudulent report on the Germans perpetrating the Katyn Massacre (IMT doc USSR-54) also compiled the report on Auschwitz (IMT doc USSR-008), which is cited by Raul Hilberg, William Shirer, and Jean-Claude Pressac.
But that's irrelevant to the pushers of this narrative. They may have completely lied about Katyn, but we are supposed to believe that they were 100% honest about Auschwitz. A correspondent has outlined this beautifully: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/01/ok-we-lied-about-katyn-but-we-told.html
The incessant noise surrounding this racket blinds us to the pernicious facts about Zionism, like the fact that the leaders of the Zionist movement were key instigators and manipulators of the World Wars: http://archive.org/details/ZionismAndTheWorldWars
The fact that Israel is behind the 9/11 attacks and the wars in the Middle East: http://archive.org/details/MastersOfDeception
The fact that if they find obstacles to their conquests, the leaders of the Zionist movement threaten to nuke the rest of the world - This intention was expressed by Martin Levi van Creveld, professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, when he wrote: “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/sep/21/israelandthepalestinians.bookextracts
And the fact that as for genocides, the reality is the exact opposite of what many people believe - a fundamental problem of the 20th Century was that of Bolshevism, which was as Jewish as Zionism, unleashing its destructive fury upon the world: http://bensteigmann.blogspot.com/2013/04/disclaimer.html
April 13, 2013 Subject:
this page is much more in depth than that
but for those who want a refutation of "Objectivesea"'s main point, who want the historical context of the original propaganda efforts being critiqued, I suggest reading "The First Holocaust" by Don Heddesheimer: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tfh/
I also gave an objective rendering of the American Hebrew article.
As an update to respond to Objectivesea's comment, claims regarding 6,000,000 "threatened Jews" went back as early as 1900, and the propaganda was continued in the 1930s, and even in the early 1940s - long before any post-war evaluation could be made.
Here's some more articles: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/11/6000000-polish-jews-dying-in-1916-1920.html
and some more: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/10/1919-six-million-jews-once-more-in-peril.html
and some more: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/10/1921-six-million-jews-propagandists.html
and some more: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/07/1939-6000000-jews-have-been-killed.html
and some more: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/07/seven-6000000-jews-yarns-1920-1930.html
Nahum Goldman also admitted in his book that the Nuremberg trial was pre-planned, partially to secure Palestine for the Zionists: http://ia700403.us.archive.org/2/items/ZionismAndTheWorldWars/NahumGoldmann_JewishParadoxQuote.jpg
and some more (before any post-war evaluation):
(Considering the "Black Book" Ehrenberg composed, which is the basis of much of the modern holocaust mythology, the following is of relevance: http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2009/12/excerpts-from-black-book-electrocution.html - for more, see the following: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2011/02/nazis-killed-jews-in-swimming-races.html)
My article goes much deeper than just this though. I also am not a Nazi. I strongly disagree with authoritarian governments. But I do not appreciate the Communist crimes that are obfuscated because of this, or the destructive Zionist entity that is founded on this. I recommend the following to see the destructive legacy that is obfuscated by the mainstream narrative: http://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm
By the way, I cannot prove this with screenshots, but "Objectivesea" and I both know this to be true, much as he might deny it. His comment below now says, "If the Internet Archive should ever run out of space on their servers, this page, along with any other postings to date by "blissentia", should be the first to be sacrificed." Before, to paraphrase from memory, it stated, "this is up now because of free speech, BUT WHEN THAT GOES AWAY [emphasis added], this page should be the first to go."
The rest of his commentary, as it stands now, is pseudo-intellectual posturing.
December 5, 2012 Subject:
Only Neo-Nazi Holocaust-denial propaganda
This entire page is indeed, as first stated, a piece of Nazi Holocaust-denial propaganda
I stand by what I wrote in my main review (below), but I now include a link to the original advertisement in the "American Hebrew" which the neo-Nazis are using in a fantastical, baroque and ultimately attempt to lend very tenuous support to their noxious ideology that either the Holocaust did not really happen or it could not have been as bad as historians know it to have been. (I had tried to post a web link to the Wikimedia Foundation image of the original 'American Hebrew' advertisement, but for some reason it had failed to show up.)
You can see the original article here:
The website that "blissentia" points to for so-called "historical context" provides only more of the same dreary fare as you can see on this page (above). The entire VHO.org site is devoted to anti-reality, anti-Holocaust propaganda, available in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. You can translate shit into any language you want, but it will remain shit nonetheless.
I know that the Internet Archive is committed to the free and uncensored distribution of human learning, but neither the article above nor the VHO.org site actually references anything that adds something useful to the sum of mankind's knowledge.
Instead, it subtracts from goodness, subtracts from wisdom, subtracts from history, subtracts from understanding. It is worse than useless; it is harmful, destructive and potentially productive of a repetition of what Hannah Arendt so famously calls the "banality of evil." If the Internet Archive should ever run out of space on their servers, this page, along with any other postings to date by "blissentia", should be the first to be sacrificed.
Only love can heal our fractured, wounded world. Lies such as those that have been posted by "blissentia" will never do it. -- Objectivesea, 3 December 2012
The main review, from 29 November 2012, which had prompted "blissentia" to comment:
The article hosted on this page is an utterly meretricious and despicable attempt to cast collective blame on Jewish people for the murder of six million Jews, Roma, homosexuals and disabled people at the hands of Nazis and Nazi-aligned groups some 20 years and more after the advertisement had been published.
The attempt of such latter-day Neo-Nazis to confuse an apprehended "holocaust" of 6,800,000 Jewish people shortly after World War I as a result of looming starvation with the actual Holocaust during World War II of six million people (the majority of whom, but not all, were Jewish) is not merely mischievous and deceptive but profoundly evil.
To then further cloud the issue by attempting to minimize the numbers of people killed in pursuit of specific Nazi plans to exterminate European Jewry, or to claim that no more Jews died in proportion to their overall numbers than was the case with other ethnic groups, is to be wilfully blind and to conspire to spread ignorance and misinformation, to try to make a banality out of an ultimate horror.
To return good for evil, to help debunk the nonsense above, to provide the actual facts as opposed to lies, here is the actual text of the ad, which I've typed out from the image of the American Hebrew" article they mention. You can see the original article here:
* * * * * * * * * * *
The fund-raising advertisement, directed to Americans mostly of Jewish ethnicity appeals for funds to he is accompanied by a sketch of an elderly man, seated and with a cane; the sketch is signed "1891, Pasternak" and entitled "Whither?"
The appeal is admittedly somewhat repetitive, but it is for the sake of rhetorical effect and is clearly and plainly intended overtly to reduce the misery of impending famine in the wake of the disruptions of World War I, the Treaty of Versailles and its harshly punitive terms demanded of the losing German side, as well the suffering brought about in the battles between contending Red and White armies after the Bolshevik Revolution.
One should not forget that at this time there were still pogroms that specifically targeted Jewish people and that Hitler and his brownshirt thugs were to rise to power a decade later through repeated, irrational appeals to hatred of Jews, appeals which did not fall on deaf ears in Germany and Austria, where such hatred was still almost instinctive for a large plurality of people.
The advertisement, while couched in terms that may seem somewhat melodramatic to today's ears, is grounded in the reality of suffering and was an honest and moving attempt to alleviate that suffering. In that sense it may best be compared with modern fundraising appeals by Oxfam, UNICEF or Medecins Sans Frontieres when a crisis arises from drought in the African Sahel, flooding in Bangladesh, a hurricane in Haiti or an earthquake in Guatemala.
Here is the text of the appeal:
"From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread.
"These children, these men and women, are our fellow-members of the human family, with the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter's cold, the same propensity to death before the fangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. We may not be their keepers, but we ought to be their helpers.
"In the face of death, in the throes of starvation, there is no place for mental distinctions of creed, no place for physical differentiations of race. In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate, only the most idealistic promptings of human nature should sway the heart and move the hand.
"Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man, but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.
"In this threatened holocaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical distinction, forgotten are the differences of historical interpretation; and the determination to help the helpless, to shelter the homeless, to clothe the naked and to feed the hungry becomes a religion at whose altar men of every race can worship and women of every creed can kneel. In this calamity the temporalities of man's fashionings fall away before the eternal verities of life, and we awaken to the fact that from the hands of one God we all come and before the tribunal of one God we all must stand on the day of final reckoning. And when that reckoning comes, mere profession of lips will not weigh a pennyweight, but deeds, mere intangible deeds, deeds that dry the tear of sorrow and allay the pain of anguish, deeds that with the spirit of the Good Samaritan pour oil and wine in wounds and find sustenance and shelter for the suffering and the stricken, will outweigh all the stars in the heavens, all the waters in the seas, all the rocks and metals in all the celestial globes that revolve in the firmament around us.
"Race is a matter of accident; creed, partly a matter of inheritance, partly a matter of environment, partly one's method of ratiocination, but our physical wants and corporeal needs are implanted in all of us by the hand of God, and the man or woman who can, and will not, hear the cry of the starving; who can, and will not, stretch for a helping hand to those who sink beneath the waves of adversity, is an assassin of nature's finest instincts, a traitor to the cause of the human family and an abjurer of the natural law written upon the tablets of every human heart by the finger of God himself.
"And so in the spirit that turned the poor widow's votive offering of copper into silver, and the silver into gold when placed upon God's altar, the people of this country are called upon to sanctify their money by giving $35,000,000 in the name of the humanity of Moses to six million famished men and women.
"Six million men and women are dying; eight hundred thousand little children are crying for bread. And why?
"Because of a war to lay Autocracy in the dust and give Democracy the sceptre of the Just.
"And in that war for democracy 200,000 Jewish lads from the United States fought beneath the Stars and Stripes. In the 77th Division alone there were 14,000 of them, and in Argonne Forest this division captured 54 German guns. This shows that at Argonne the Jewish boys from the United States fought for democracy as Joshua fought against the Amalekites on the plains of Abraham. In an address on the so-called "Lost Battalion," led by Colonel Whittlesey of Pittsfield, Major-General Alexander shows the fighting stuff these Jewish boys were made of. In some way or another, Whittlesey's command was surrounded. They were short of rations. They tried to get word back to the rear, telling of their plight. They tried and they tried, but their men never got through. Paralysis and stupefaction and despair were in the air. And when the hour was darkest and all seemed lost, a soldier lad stepped forward and said to Col. Whittlesey: "I will try to get through." He tried; he was wounded; he had to creep and crawl, but he got through. Today he wears the Distinguished Service Cross, and his name is ABRAHAM KROTOSHINSKY.
"Because of this was for Democracy, six million Jewish men and women are starving across the seas; eight hundred thousand Jewish babies are crying for bread."